An unjust law is not a law at all
500 words
2-3 paragraphs (150-250 words)
Natural law
Law as authority
Moral view point
Compliance with the law is demanded
As long as society accepts this, it is a law-
The concept of law is important to understand
Layout
Intro- my argument- support
Form vs function
Positivism vs natural law theory
Conclude
Significantly a set of rules in order to be seen and classed as a law need to have a particular degree of moral standard. This is because unlike the positivism perspective, law is not solely a system of rules that performs a particular function.
Believe the natural law theory that law is a set of legitimate rules that must be morally legitimate. This is because the essence of law follows the idea that morality is interlinked with law and it is of significant importance
This is because law should be seen as morally justified for society to follow it. Significantly, without this moral legitimacy to law then it is just seen as a “meaningless concept and as the rules of the powerful”.
This is because the purpose and the function of law must be taken into account not just the form. This is because law is in place to regulate society’s behaviour. Since law must be “just” then an unjust law is not a law.
As a long as a large portion of society of society view it as unjust then it is not a law.
Law as a moral judgement.
Hart- structure of rules, The Concept of Law 1961 which focuses on law as a system of rules with a formal structure. This would argue that a law is a law. However, this does not take into account the moral legitimacy which is at the essence of law which make a...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.