This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Legal Foundations (LAWS110) Notes

An Unjust Law Is Not A Law Notes

Updated An Unjust Law Is Not A Law Notes

Legal Foundations (LAWS110) Notes

Legal Foundations (LAWS110)

Approximately 168 pages

The notes are from lectures and tutorials for legal foundations from a high achieving student from the lecturer John Hopkins and Sasha.

The course aims to provide a foundation in the skills of legal research and legal writing together with an academic grounding in topics fundamental to the New Zealand legal system. The course will involve training by way of proactive exercises in legal research and legal writing. It will also examine the historical development of New Zealand's legal system, f...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Legal Foundations (LAWS110) Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

An unjust law is not a law. This is clear by determining that within the essence of law is a moral obligation that legitimises laws. This means that law is a moral judgement intended to create a just order in society.

A morally unjust law is not a law because morals legitimise a law and when morals are absenct in the law it ceases to be a valid law. As natural law-theorists like Fuller believe there is a “reciprocal relationship” between the law and moral obligation.1 Hence, when a law is morally justified it legitimises the law. Thus, an immoral law is not a law because it lacks a moral authority which is at the essence of law.2 In Fullerian terms, law and morals are interconnected so that legal validity does not exist without moral validity and that legal obligation does not exist without moral obligation.3

This is overlooked by legal positivists who interpret the law from a procedural viewpoint rather than its “external” viewpoint of morality due to the Hart model.4 Legal positivists believe when interpreting this model that there is no connection between law and morality due to a formal moral neutral concept of law. However, this is an insular viewpoint that oversimplifies the concept of law by ignoring the moral aspect of law which is vital because it is the purpose for the existence of law and it legitimises a law. As natural law theorists rightly believe that without the moral authority of a law it loses its legal validity. Significantly, without this moral legitimacy law is seen as a rule exerted by the powerful.5 As Raz believes that when law no longer has a moral authority it becomes a perversion to law and it ceases to be morally justified to be coercive to society as a law. 6

An unjust law is not a law because it does not fulfil the purpose of law. The function of law is to morally regulate society’s behaviour and that there should be a “just order” in society formed by morally legitimate laws. According to the Fullerian ideal the principles and purpose of law is not just to create order, but it is to create a morally just order...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Legal Foundations (LAWS110) Notes.